Subscribe to Our
FREE NEWSLETTER
H O M E
WHAT IS
REMOTE VIEWING?
PREMIUM PROJECTS
Tunguska
Area 51
Roswell UFO Crash
Martin Luther King
Adolf Hitler
JFK Assassination
The Phoenix Lights
Aliens on Iapetus!
Cydonia, Mars
9/11 Project
FREE PROJECTS
Time-Cross Project
Atlantis (NEW!
Revised 2016)
JFK Afterlife
Great Giza Pyramid
Multiple Universes
Climate Change:
2008-2013
Exploding Planet
Base on Mars
INSTRUCTION
SRV (FREE!)
The Young Masters
CRV Instruction
CRV History and Resources
RESOURCES
Eight Martinis
(Magazine published
by Daz Smith)
Selected Interviews
Mission
Other Resources
YOUTUBE
FarsightPress
(Science Channel)
Farsight VLOG
LIGHT SIDE
Farsight Chronicles
(Comic by Vic Guiza)
Transistence (Comic and video web series
by Courtney Brown)
STORES
FARSIGHT
PRESENTATIONS
(Videos)
FARSIGHT PRESS
(Books)
FARSIGHT'S STORE
(Merchandise)
CONNECTING
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Corporate Structure
CONTACT US
Donate to The Farsight Interview
Subscribe to the Farsight Newsletter

Experiment #4

Viewer: Joey Jerome, Session #2

Tasker: John D. Berryman, M.D.

Data: Type 3 (viewer blind and solo)

Target Specific:

Essential Cue:
The Battle of Gettysburg (July 1863)

Numbered Aspects:
1. The Battle of Gettysburg / event (July 1863)
2. Pickett's charge / event (July 3, 1863)
3. General J.E.B Stuart ordering the 1st Virginia to advance against the Union Calvary / event (July 3, 1863)

Comments: The target for this experiment has some interesting structural defects. These defects have to be considered when evaluating the results of this experiment. (Click Here to read about this target.) Despite the problems with this target, this nonetheless is a session with an unusually poor level of target contact. It turns out that the viewer conducted this session under conditions of extreme fatigue due to an abnormally high daily work load. Also, due to this work load, the viewer was not able to meditate regularly. These conditions were unavoidable. Better viewing conditions are anticipated for future experiments. We have decided to include this session in our public demonstration for its heuristic value, despite the conditions under which the session was conducted.

Session Pages

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16

Page 17

Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

Page 21