Subscribe to Our
FREE NEWSLETTER
H O M E
Public Experiments
Great Giza Pyramid
Atlantis
Multiple Universes
Climate Change:
2008-2013
Exploding Planet
Base on Mars
"Mysteries" Series
Selected Interviews
Video Library
Mission
Resources
HRVG
CRV Instruction
CRV History and Resources
SRV
IRVA
Eight Martinis (Magazine)
Farsight Press
RSS feed
Corporate Structure
FARSIGHT'S STORE
CONTACT US
Donate to The Farsight Interview
Subscribe to the Farsight Newsletter
Bookmark and Share

Multiple Universes RV Project Session Download Page

Overview:These sessions were done in November 2009, and they describe the Norwegian spiral anomaly that occurred on 9 December 2009. Please click on the yellow banner below to see the full target specification, which includes links to a video and an article regarding the event. This uses remote viewing to predict a future event.

"Clarity scores" follow the session comments below, beginning with a "C" followed by a number. Clarity scores evaluate the sessions with respect to the known and verifiable characteristics of the target. Clarity scores can range from 0 to 3, and they convey the following meaning:

3: The known and verifiable target aspects are described exceptionally well with few, minor, or no decoding errors.
2: The known and verifiable target aspects are described well. There may be some notable decoding errors.
1: The known and verifiable target aspects are described minimally. There may also be significant decoding errors.
0: The known and verifiable target aspects are described very poorly or not at all.

Decoding errors occur when a remote viewer perceives something that is real at the target, but the description of this perception is not entirely correct. Again, the perception is real, but the description of it is only partially accurate. For example, if someone describes a city with tall skyscrapers as a mountain range, that is a decoding error. The perception is correct in terms of the topology, but the characterization of it as a mountain range is incorrect. Also, if a person places trees or animals in a barren natural landscape, that is a decoding error. The perception of a natural landscape is correct, but the conscious mind added things that it thought would be normal for a natural landscape. Experienced remote viewers are trained to minimize decoding errors, and analysts are trained to discount decoding errors that would be more common with certain types of targets.

Some of the clarity scores are followed by a "UEP" marker, which stands for "Unique Element Portrayal." A Unique Element Portrayal indicator, or UEP marker, signifies that the session contains at least one description that unambiguously describes a unique element in the target. A unique target element is some target component that is not a normal element in other targets. For example, flat land would not be a unique target element since many targets are located on flat land. However, something much more specific with, say, a unique shape, purpose, or energy would be a possible unique target element. Unique Element Portrayals often involve highly specific sketches of some element of the target, although a highly specific verbal description could also qualify. If the session does contain at least one Unique Element Portrayal, then a UEP marker is appended to the clarity score. Sessions with clarity scores of 3 that are also appended with UEP markers are normally considered unambiguous evidence of profound remote viewing, and such sessions should normally satisfy the judging concerns of all reasonable people as being accurate descriptions of the given target.

Tasker for this experiment: Glenn Wheaton

Experimental Design Architect and Analyst: Courtney Brown

Date target will be assigned: After 31 December 2009

Nature of the target: An event that occurs during December 2009

Number of sessions conducted in November and posted as of 4 December 2009: 6

This Experiment's Target (Click)

Viewer Name
Sessions done in October describing a December event
 
CRV Sessions: Encrypted Decrypted Comments
Daz Download Download This is an excellent session. The viewer does perceive that the target involves a circular energy display that involves technology. (Especially see pages 5 through 11.) The description focuses on technology that could easily be of human origin, lending credibility to the officially stated news story that this event may have been a result of a Russian rocket malfunction. C3:UEP
HRVG Sessions:
Sita Download Download The central idea of this session is that the target event involves a hot energy source. There is also the indication that the event involves some type of technological measuring instrumentation, and that it involves an aspect that eventually showers down on Earth (see especially the sketches on pages 3 and 9, pdf numbering), all of which would be appropriate in describing a malfunctioning Russian rocket. See also the descriptions of explosions, burning sulfuric smells in a cold environment on page 5 (pdf numbering). C2
Debra Download Download This viewer clearly describes and sketches the circular and radiating nature of the target event. (See especially the sketch on page 4, viewer numbering. See also the second sketch on page 5, viewer numbering, together with the words "aircraft in clouds.") On page 13 (viewer numbering), the viewer describes the target event as involving sparkling light that is similar to a fireworks display. The session also contains descriptions of the humans on the ground who are watching the event. C3UEP
Maria Download Download This session contains descriptions that predominantly focus on the ground environment in Norway. It is not unusual for each viewer to focus on different aspects of a target. C1
Michele Download Download This is a new viewer. This is also a difficult target. Nonetheless, the viewer does perceive that the target occurs near or over water, that it involves "light bouncing off structure" (page 4, pdf numbering), and that the target event takes place in a cold and icy environment (page 5, pdf numbering). C1
SRV Sessions:
Athena Download Download This is an excellent session. The session begins with descriptions of people watching an event. Beginning with page 9 (pdf numbering), the viewer describes the object as elevated ("off ground," "air beneath the object"). The object is giving off "artificial lighting." From page 9 (pdf numbering), the object is "rotating," "moving," "on display," "unusually shaped," with many people observing the object. Page 12 (pdf numbering) contains an extraordinarily good sketch of the target, and web site visitors should be sure to examine this closely. C3:UEP

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

This is a challenging target for most viewers since it involves an aerial event that is highly unusual in its configuration. Nonetheless, these remote-viewing sessions contain highly accurate descriptions of this event. Web site visitors should be sure to examine the YouTube and Wikipedia descriptions of the target event that are linked to the yellow banner above ("The Target for This Experiment") before examing the data in the remote-viewing sessions. All of these sessions contain useful descriptions of the target event. However, web site visitors will want to pay particular attention to some of the sketches in the sessions, especially noting Athena's sketch on page 12 of her session.

It is useful to note that none of these data indicate an extraterrestial origin to the spiral anomaly. It appears that the official description of a malfunctioning rocket may be correct.