Welcome to the Time-Cross Project conducted at The Farsight Institute. Here we have remote viewers describe major news events a month before the events actually happen. The events that are the "targets" for the project are the most newsworthy events of a given month, and they are determined by the rules of the project and an automated process involving news analysis that is described below. The events are are totally verifiable. The remote-viewing sessions are recorded live on video, and uploaded to YouTube. YouTube lists the publication dates for the videos, so people can be certain that the remote-viewing sessions are done the month before the events occur.
Click on the banners below to see the video results.
Password to Decrypt the Paper Sessions Using Winzip: jeawrs98ar (requires the WinZip program)
The EgyptAir Flight 804 project linked above was a preliminary experiment used to help set-up the Time-Cross Project. It is not an official release of the Time-Cross Project since the rules for the project were not finalized at the time of the session, and public verification of the video remote-viewing session was not accomplished prior to the target event. It is offered here only because it is interesting in its own right, and because it helps explain a bit of history behind the development of the experimental design for the Time-Cross Project. For those people who downloaded the paper sessions for this episode back in April and early May 2016, the password do decrytp them is salkdfaw78. The WinZip program is needed to decrypt the sessions.
Here is the sequence of happenings:
Remote-viewing sessions are done during month #1 and uploaded to YouTube with the standard YouTube published date.
Major events happen in the world during month #2.
In month #3, the news events that are reported in Farsight's News Analysis Table are compared with the remote-viewing data. Potential news event targets are also evaluated using an automated process of news analysis which involves a weighted pool of potential targets. The news analysis is publicly verifiable and cannot be influenced by anyone. Finally, an analysis of the results is published.
Data used to determine the news event targets for each month are linked further below. The criteria for the chosen major news event are as follows:
The event should involve significant physical activity by objects and subjects.
The event should involve something unexpected or unscheduled.
The event must be a leading headline news story that is featured on prominent news web sites. Four web sites are monitored for this experiment: CNN (U.S. and International), The New York Times, and the BBC. But sometimes important events are not reported on those web sites, and are instead reported on alternative news web sites. When that happens, we will list the source of the news event story.
The event should involve more than one daily news cycle for the month, preferably with numerous and related stories.
The target must be of significant public interest.
The target must be of international interest, as evidenced (for example) by being covered as a headline event on both the U.S. and International editions of CNN.
If a significant event occurs near the end of the month, then the counting of news cycles and cumulative links can extend into the next month until the event fades from the headline pages so as to fully evaluate the importance of the event. Rarely does a news story remain on the main page of a news outlet for more than a week.
If two or more events of a similar nature and/or cause occur on different dates of the month, then the target would be the combination of the two events. For example (obviously fictional in this case), if the Moon disappears into another dimension on two different dates during the same month, then the target would be the general or combined disappearance of the Moon during that month. Examples of types of events that would be combined within the same month are (a) scattered fires that are part of a larger area that is aflame, such as scattered statewide California wildfires, (b) terror events caused or inspired by the same group in a larger campaign, (c) wartime events from a larger military engagement, such as various elements of the Normandy Invasion of World War II, (d) multiple large political gatherings (including demonstrations) with similar characteristics, (e) weather related events that are the result of the same general weather condition.
The news analysis that helps determine the target events uses a weighted pool of potential targets. The viewers are expected to perceive one or more of the targets that are highly weighted in the target pool for each month. This not an exclusive process. Target events can occur which do not score highly in the news analysis table.
The remote-viewing data should ideally be an obvious match to news events that occur in a given month. Events that have strikingly unusual characteristics that are revealed in the remote-viewing data are of high value in determining that the perceptual data are accurate.
All work is done blind at The Farsight Institute. The target event has not even happened when the remote-viewing sessions have been done! Thus, the remote viewers have no idea what target will eventually be chosen. Plus, the determination of the target is automated using a process that is publicly verifiable and impossible to cheat.
This public experiment offers clear proof of the nonlinearity of time, and indeed, that time as a real thing that separates events does not exist. Clearly, Farsight remote viewers are transferring perceptual information across time and space in complete violation of the currently accepted relativistic and classical "laws" of physics, laws that are obviously in need of serious revision.