Subscribe to Our
Presidential Meetings with ETs
Galactic Federation of Worlds
The Mystery of Puma Punku
The Reptilians: Here and Now
Annihilation of the Dinosaurs
RA: The "Sun God"
Remote Viewing
Star Wars
Eye of the Sahara
Göbekli Tepe
Pandemic Origin
ET News
Human Leadership
Has Been
Where We
Came From
The Death Traps
'Oumuamua and
the Bird of Prey
Secret Apollo
Moon Missions
Moses: Beyond Exodus
War In Heaven
Area 51
Roswell UFO Crash
The Phoenix Lights
Aliens on Iapetus!
Cydonia, Mars
Appeal to Galactic Federation of Worlds
Human News
Time-Cross Monthly
Mysteries Series
Base on Mars
JFK Assassination
9/11 Project
Adolf Hitler
Atlantis (NEW!
Revised 2016)
Martin Luther King
JFK Afterlife
Great Giza Pyramid
Multiple Universes
Exploding Planet
Cryptocurrency Forecasts
Farsight Meditation
The Young Masters
In-Person Instruction
CRV History and Resources
Eight Martinis
(Magazine published
by Daz Smith)
Selected Interviews
Other Resources
(Science Channel)
(Arts Channel)
Farsight Chronicles
(Comic by Vic Guiza)
(Video Streaming)
Corporate Structure
Donate to The Farsight Interview
Subscribe to the Farsight Newsletter

Multiple Universes RV Project Session Download Page

Overview: These sessions were done in February 2009, and they describe a rocket launch event at Cape Canaveral, Florida that occurred in March 2009. This uses remote viewing to accurately predict a future event.

"Clarity scores" follow the session comments below, beginning with a "C" followed by a number. Clarity scores evaluate the sessions with respect to the known and verifiable characteristics of the target. Clarity scores can range from 0 to 3, and they convey the following meaning:

3: The known and verifiable target aspects are described exceptionally well with few, minor, or no decoding errors.
2: The known and verifiable target aspects are described well. There may be some notable decoding errors.
1: The known and verifiable target aspects are described minimally. There may also be significant decoding errors.
0: The known and verifiable target aspects are described very poorly or not at all.

Decoding errors occur when a remote viewer perceives something that is real at the target, but the description of this perception is not entirely correct. Again, the perception is real, but the description of it is only partially accurate. For example, if someone describes a city with tall skyscrapers as a mountain range, that is a decoding error. The perception is correct in terms of the topology, but the characterization of it as a mountain range is incorrect. Also, if a person places trees or animals in a barren natural landscape, that is a decoding error. The perception of a natural landscape is correct, but the conscious mind added things that it thought would be normal for a natural landscape. Experienced remote viewers are trained to minimize decoding errors, and analysts are trained to discount decoding errors that would be more common with certain types of targets.

Some of the clarity scores are followed by a "UEP" marker, which stands for "Unique Element Portrayal." A Unique Element Portrayal indicator, or UEP marker, signifies that the session contains at least one description that unambiguously describes a unique element in the target. A unique target element is some target component that is not a normal element in other targets. For example, flat land would not be a unique target element since many targets are located on flat land. However, something much more specific with, say, a unique shape, purpose, or energy would be a possible unique target element. Unique Element Portrayals often involve highly specific sketches of some element of the target, although a highly specific verbal description could also qualify. If the session does contain at least one Unique Element Portrayal, then a UEP marker is appended to the clarity score. Sessions with clarity scores of 3 that are also appended with UEP markers are normally considered unambiguous evidence of profound remote viewing, and such sessions should normally satisfy the judging concerns of all reasonable people as being accurate descriptions of the given target.

Tasker for this experiment: Lyn Buchanan

Experimental Design Architect and Analyst: Courtney Brown

Date target was assigned: 1 April 2009

Nature of the target: An event that occurs during March 2009

Number of sessions conducted in February and posted as of 3 March 2009: 9

This Experiment's Target (Click)

Viewer Name
Sessions done in February describing a March event
CRV Sessions: Encrypted Decrypted Comments
Daz Smith Download Download This viewer describes an event involving structures and excited subjects, with a large central structure having a pointy topology, all of which is appropriate for this target. C2
Pat Sage Download Download Concepts of spectators watching machines are correctly perceived by this viewer. C2
Rising Sun Touch Download Download This viewer correctly perceives the central energy source, and even identifies it as a "missile launch." C3:UEP
Romferd Download Download The data in this session describe many spectators (often in a protected position) watching an event involving a huge, swirling energy source, which is appropriate for this target. C3:UEP
Apollo 1969 Download Download Many spectators watching an event near a shoreline are accurately perceived by this viewer. C2
HRVG Sessions:
Viewer 212 Download Download In this session, note the correct depiction of the coastline where the launch took place, the centrality of the energy course (the launch), spectators in protected areas, and some people close to the energy source wearing protective clothing. C3:UEP

(Incomplete version, posted on time)
(Complete version, posted late due to a clerical error)

(Incomplete version, posted on time)
(Complete version, received on time but posted late due to a clerical error)
The sketches in this session are remarkably good. In particular, note the S3 sketch on page 8. In this and other sketches, the viewer describes the diversity of the naval and aerial support vessels that accompany all such rocket launches. She also perceives the energy source that is central to all of the support vehicles, and makes particular note of the radar facilities used during the launch. C3:UEP
Maria Download Download A large, firey energy event with pungent chemical fumes in a humid environment are all appropriate perceptions for this target. C2
Anne Download Download This viewer accurately perceives a hot, firey energy event with gaseous plumes of fumes shooting upwards. C2


In general, this experiment went quite well. There were no totally "off" sessions. Nearly all viewers perceived the basic gestalts of the target, including the coastline, multiple subjects watching an event in the distance, and a huge source of energy (which was the rocket launch). Some viewers also correctly perceived that the subjects watching the event were either close to the event and wearing protective clothing, or they were watching the event from within a protective structure. Some of the sessions are simply remarkable in terms of accuracy and detail. Web site visitors should take time to closely examine the sessions of Debra (HRVG - the complete version) in which the target location was described with a high level of detail with respect to naval vessels that were present at the rocket launch. Also, Rising Sun Touch (CRV) correctly identified the target as a missile launch.