Subscribe to Our
Earth's Defense
Galactic Defense
Mystery of
Nikola Tesla
of Reptilians
Battle of Dulce
Close Encounters
Reptilian Origin
in the Milky Way
Vladimir Putin
and His Inner Circle
Super Soldiers
of Ceres
2024 Election
Noah's Ark
Ashtar Command
and Bases on Venus
The Prophet
Sodom and
Public Negotiations
The Escape
The Domain
Presidential Meetings with ETs
Galactic Federation of Worlds
The Mystery of Puma Punku
The Reptilians: Here and Now
Annihilation of the Dinosaurs
RA: The "Sun God"
The Nazca Lines
Remote Viewing
Star Wars
Eye of the Sahara
Göbekli Tepe
Pandemic Origin
ET News
Human Leadership
Has Been
Where We
Came From
The Death Traps
'Oumuamua and
the Bird of Prey
Secret Apollo
Moon Missions
Moses: Beyond Exodus
War In Heaven
Area 51
Roswell UFO Crash
The Phoenix Lights
Aliens on Iapetus!
Cydonia, Mars
Publication Dates
Human News 2023
Human News 2022
Human News 2021
Human News 2020
Appeal to Galactic Federation of Worlds
Time-Cross Monthly
Mysteries Series
Base on Mars
JFK Assassination
9/11 Project
Adolf Hitler
Atlantis (NEW!
Revised 2016)
Martin Luther King
JFK Afterlife
Great Giza Pyramid
Multiple Universes
Exploding Planet
Past Forecasts and Analyses
CICO+ Current
Forecasts and
Currency List
Farsight Meditation
The Young Masters
In-Person Instruction
CRV History and Resources
Eight Martinis
(Magazine published
by Daz Smith)
Selected Interviews
Other Resources
(Science Channel)
(Arts Channel)
Farsight Chronicles
(Comic by Vic Guiza)
(Video Streaming)
Corporate Structure
Donate to The Farsight Interview
Subscribe to the Farsight Newsletter

Multiple Universes RV Project Session Download Page

Overview: These sessions were done in July 2009, and they describe a military musical event that occurred in Edinburgh, Scotland during August 2009. Please click on the yellow banner below to see the full target specification. This uses remote viewing to accurately predict a future event.

"Clarity scores" follow the session comments below, beginning with a "C" followed by a number. Clarity scores evaluate the sessions with respect to the known and verifiable characteristics of the target. Clarity scores can range from 0 to 3, and they convey the following meaning:

3: The known and verifiable target aspects are described exceptionally well with few, minor, or no decoding errors.
2: The known and verifiable target aspects are described well. There may be some notable decoding errors.
1: The known and verifiable target aspects are described minimally. There may also be significant decoding errors.
0: The known and verifiable target aspects are described very poorly or not at all.

Decoding errors occur when a remote viewer perceives something that is real at the target, but the description of this perception is not entirely correct. Again, the perception is real, but the description of it is only partially accurate. For example, if someone describes a city with tall skyscrapers as a mountain range, that is a decoding error. The perception is correct in terms of the topology, but the characterization of it as a mountain range is incorrect. Also, if a person places trees or animals in a barren natural landscape, that is a decoding error. The perception of a natural landscape is correct, but the conscious mind added things that it thought would be normal for a natural landscape. Experienced remote viewers are trained to minimize decoding errors, and analysts are trained to discount decoding errors that would be more common with certain types of targets.

Some of the clarity scores are followed by a "UEP" marker, which stands for "Unique Element Portrayal." A Unique Element Portrayal indicator, or UEP marker, signifies that the session contains at least one description that unambiguously describes a unique element in the target. A unique target element is some target component that is not a normal element in other targets. For example, flat land would not be a unique target element since many targets are located on flat land. However, something much more specific with, say, a unique shape, purpose, or energy would be a possible unique target element. Unique Element Portrayals often involve highly specific sketches of some element of the target, although a highly specific verbal description could also qualify. If the session does contain at least one Unique Element Portrayal, then a UEP marker is appended to the clarity score. Sessions with clarity scores of 3 that are also appended with UEP markers are normally considered unambiguous evidence of profound remote viewing, and such sessions should normally satisfy the judging concerns of all reasonable people as being accurate descriptions of the given target.

Tasker for this experiment: Glenn Wheaton

Experimental Design Architect and Analyst: Courtney Brown

Date target was assigned: After 8 September 2009

Nature of the target: An event that occurs during August 2009

Number of sessions conducted in July and posted as of 3 August 2009: 8 (One session posted late on 11 August, see below.)

This Experiment's Target (Click)

Viewer Name
Sessions done in July describing an August event
CRV Sessions: Encrypted Decrypted Comments
Daz Smith Download Download The sounds perceived in this session are important and quite accurate. See especially page 7 (viewer numbering). But much of the remainder of the session tends to develop interpretation that differs from actual target characteristics. C1
Romferd Download Download The viewer began the session hearing sounds (lots of banging) that are appropriate for the target. But then the viewer develops interpretations that differ from actual target characteristics. C1
HRVG Sessions:
Dick Download Download This is an excellent session that captures most of the central gestalts of the target plus a great deal of accurate detail. Web site visitors are encouraged to look at this session very closely. The viewer correctly perceives and describes in detail the large assembly of people, the organization of people into rows, the lights in the performance area, the uniforms of the participants (see page 17, pdf numbering), and even the electrical hum associated with the amplification effects. C3:UEP
Debra Download Download The viewer correctly perceives the general gestalts of throngs of people in an outdoor setting with lots of "wailing noise" (page 3, pdf numbering) and a nearby large structure. Some perceptions appear to differ from actual target characteristics, such as the domed characterization of the nearby structure. But the general gestalts are correct. C2
Maria Download Download This is an excellent example of how each viewer can focus on different aspects of the same target. In this case, this viewer focuses on the general geographical setting of the target area rather than the throngs of people at the Tattoo event. In particular, the viewer focuses on a nearby ocean coast, boats appropriate for a port, nearby mountains, and a tall structure with a pointed roof. The nearby coast is obvious in the second image below on this page. Also, close examination of the second image of Edinburgh, Scotland at the bottom of this page reveals that there are a few low mountains or steeply raised areas immediately to the East of the Edinburgh Castle. (Look for the topology behind the words "Castle Self Catering.") C3
Anne Download Download This viewer correctly perceives the idea of people watching an event, the coastal area (last page of session), and the institutional structure. C1
Sita Download Download This session is best viewed from the summary near the end (page 17, pdf numbering). While there appear to be some decoding errors, the viewer does conclude that the target is within a town that is near some mountains and a large body of water. C1
Michele Download Download This is a beginning viewer. The viewer does perceive some sounds that are appropriate for the target event. (See page 3, pdf numbering.) C1


This experiment produced sessions with a mix of data, some of which are remarkably accurate and detailed. Web site visitors should closely examine these sessions paying particular attention to how different viewers can perceive different aspects of a target and the target environment. With the above sessions, Dick's comes closest to describing many accurate details of the actual event, whereas other viewers sometimes focus more on the target's more general geographical (coastal) topology.

This experiment was different from past experiments in that Courtney Brown looked at the session data prior to posting the sessions on 3 August 2009. A basic summary was made of the target data which can be found HERE. Theoretically, such a summary could be utilized by an analyst who would be interested in the prediction prior to the event happening.

Edinburg Castle

Edinburgh, Scotland