Multiple Universes RV Project Session Download Page
Overview: These sessions were done in July 2009, and they describe a military musical event that occurred in Edinburgh, Scotland during August 2009. Please click on the yellow banner below to see the full target specification. This uses remote viewing to accurately predict a future event.
"Clarity scores" follow the session comments below, beginning with a "C" followed by a number. Clarity scores evaluate the sessions with respect to the known and verifiable characteristics of the target. Clarity scores can range from 0 to 3, and they convey the following meaning:
3: The known and verifiable target aspects are described exceptionally well with few, minor, or no decoding errors.
2: The known and verifiable target aspects are described well. There may be some notable decoding errors.
1: The known and verifiable target aspects are described minimally. There may also be significant decoding errors.
0: The known and verifiable target aspects are described very poorly or not at all.
Decoding errors occur when a remote viewer perceives something that is real at the target, but the description of this perception is not entirely correct. Again, the perception is real, but the description of it is only partially accurate. For example, if someone describes a city with tall skyscrapers as a mountain range, that is a decoding error. The perception is correct in terms of the topology, but the characterization of it as a mountain range is incorrect. Also, if a person places trees or animals in a barren natural landscape, that is a decoding error. The perception of a natural landscape is correct, but the conscious mind added things that it thought would be normal for a natural landscape. Experienced remote viewers are trained to minimize decoding errors, and analysts are trained to discount decoding errors that would be more common with certain types of targets.
Some of the clarity scores are followed by a "UEP" marker, which stands for "Unique Element Portrayal." A Unique Element Portrayal indicator, or UEP marker, signifies that the session contains at least one description that unambiguously describes a unique element in the target. A unique target element is some target component that is not a normal element in other targets. For example, flat land would not be a unique target element since many targets are located on flat land. However, something much more specific with, say, a unique shape, purpose, or energy would be a possible unique target element. Unique Element Portrayals often involve highly specific sketches of some element of the target, although a highly specific verbal description could also qualify. If the session does contain at least one Unique Element Portrayal, then a UEP marker is appended to the clarity score. Sessions with clarity scores of 3 that are also appended with UEP markers are normally considered unambiguous evidence of profound remote viewing, and such sessions should normally satisfy the judging concerns of all reasonable people as being accurate descriptions of the given target.
Tasker for this experiment: Glenn Wheaton
Experimental Design Architect and Analyst: Courtney Brown
Date target was assigned: After 8 September 2009
Nature of the target: An event that occurs during August 2009
Number of sessions conducted in July and posted as of 3 August 2009: 8 (One session posted late on 11 August, see below.)
(Click)
| Viewer Name | Sessions done in July describing an August event | ||||
| CRV Sessions: | Encrypted | Decrypted | Comments | ||
| Daz Smith | Download | Download | The sounds perceived in this session are important and quite accurate. See especially page 7 (viewer numbering). But much of the remainder of the session tends to develop interpretation that differs from actual target characteristics. C1 | ||
| Romferd | Download | Download | The viewer began the session hearing sounds (lots of banging) that are appropriate for the target. But then the viewer develops interpretations that differ from actual target characteristics. C1 | ||
| HRVG Sessions: | |||||
| Dick | Download | Download | This is an excellent session that captures most of the central gestalts of the target plus a great deal of accurate detail. Web site visitors are encouraged to look at this session very closely. The viewer correctly perceives and describes in detail the large assembly of people, the organization of people into rows, the lights in the performance area, the uniforms of the participants (see page 17, pdf numbering), and even the electrical hum associated with the amplification effects. C3:UEP | ||
| Debra | Download | Download | The viewer correctly perceives the general gestalts of throngs of people in an outdoor setting with lots of "wailing noise" (page 3, pdf numbering) and a nearby large structure. Some perceptions appear to differ from actual target characteristics, such as the domed characterization of the nearby structure. But the general gestalts are correct. C2 | ||
| Maria | Download | Download | This is an excellent example of how each viewer can focus on different aspects of the same target. In this case, this viewer focuses on the general geographical setting of the target area rather than the throngs of people at the Tattoo event. In particular, the viewer focuses on a nearby ocean coast, boats appropriate for a port, nearby mountains, and a tall structure with a pointed roof. The nearby coast is obvious in the second image below on this page. Also, close examination of the second image of Edinburgh, Scotland at the bottom of this page reveals that there are a few low mountains or steeply raised areas immediately to the East of the Edinburgh Castle. (Look for the topology behind the words "Castle Self Catering.") C3 | ||
| Anne | Download | Download | This viewer correctly perceives the idea of people watching an event, the coastal area (last page of session), and the institutional structure. C1 | ||
| Sita | Download | Download | This session is best viewed from the summary near the end (page 17, pdf numbering). While there appear to be some decoding errors, the viewer does conclude that the target is within a town that is near some mountains and a large body of water. C1 | ||
| Michele | Download | Download | This is a beginning viewer. The viewer does perceive some sounds that are appropriate for the target event. (See page 3, pdf numbering.) C1 | ||
SUMMARY OF RESULTS |
This experiment produced sessions with a mix of data, some of which are remarkably accurate and detailed. Web site visitors should closely examine these sessions paying particular attention to how different viewers can perceive different aspects of a target and the target environment. With the above sessions, Dick's comes closest to describing many accurate details of the actual event, whereas other viewers sometimes focus more on the target's more general geographical (coastal) topology.
This experiment was different from past experiments in that Courtney Brown looked at the session data prior to posting the sessions on 3 August 2009. A basic summary was made of the target data which can be found HERE. Theoretically, such a summary could be utilized by an analyst who would be interested in the prediction prior to the event happening.
